Showing posts with label USA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label USA. Show all posts

Monday, May 02, 2011

The death of Osama Bin Laden, but not of al-Qaeda

Due the evolution of the al-Qaeda, the death of Osama Bin Laden although hugely symbolic and a psychological shock, especially to the 'terminally deluded' who actually carry out atrocities, is not, sadly the death knell of the al-Qaeda.

This is due to al-Qaeda having evolved into initially a 'franchise' and now with the exception of the core group, more into a purely a brand name, used by groups loosely affiliated, rather than being directed by central a strategy. Even the al-Qaeda ideology package has been modified by these groups to suit local circumstances and due to rise of sectarian difference, the 'value' of the al-Qaeda brand has also declined with certain Groups distancing themselves from their al-Qaeda connections. What has not changed is that across the board these groups ideology is still the same mixture of hate, corrupted religious beliefs coupled with a nihilistic agenda (What I find strange and frankly worrying is that so many otherwise intelligent people can believe in an ideology that would have been considered extreme even in the 12th AD).

The remaining senior members of what formed the core of al-Qaeda have in relative terms, only a small number of terrorists under their direct control but still have influence, albeit declining, with some affiliates This does not mean this core group isn't still extremely dangerous. Although none of them has the profile, or charisma to replace Bin Laden, they are to some extent revered in their own right and it would make the world a better place if they could join their leader in hell as soon as possible..

It is almost certain that all groups using the al-Qaeda Brand and even those that due recent differences have distanced themselves from their al-Qaeda inspired roots will attempt revenge attacks. Indeed some have already announced their intention to do so. Whilst any successful attack will cause death, suffering and grief, what concerns me most is those groups who have learned the lessons of careful planning, have the money and human resources to attempt revenge on a single major attack on a high profile target and to whom 'revenge is a dish best eaten cold' makes sense.

However what may, or may not happen in the following days and weeks, the World is a better place for the death of this evil man and I can only commend the Intelligence operation and subsequent US Special Forces action that resulted in his death. It is already apparent that this took years of hard and often frustrating Intelligence work and I suspect at times carried out at high risk by individual agents, culminating a 40 minute fire fight as US Navy SEALS attacked the Compound. Whatever recognition the US gives those involved the rest of us should also give them our thanks and congratulations on a job well done.

Friday, January 21, 2011

Linda Norgrove Articles Guardian 21st Jan 2011

Today the Guardian ran two similar articles on Linda Norgrove and both are informative, interesting and worth reading:
Linda Norgrove took photos of Afghan captor before death in botched rescue
and
Linda Norgrove: 'She took a lot of risks'
I just wish they hadn't used the word 'botched' (twice in the first article and once in the second), 'failed' would have been fine.

Moving on: One important element in both articles is that Linda Norgrove's parents have established:
The Linda Norgrove Foundation which is a new grant-giving trust that provides funding for women, families and children in Afghanistan. The Foundation provides help in the following areas:
  • Education
  • Health
  • Childcare, including orphanages
  • Scholarships to help Afghan women go to university.
  • The foundation certainly deserves support in its aims.

    To its credit the Guardian has made a donation to the Foundation. One hopes it makes similar donations to the families of British and Americian charities that support the families of those killed in action? Appears not, but then maybe I botched up my search keywords!

    Monday, November 08, 2010

    Should UK cyber defences include offensive operations to protect UK interests?

    This question was posed in a tweet by @Warwick_Ashford, which was retweeted to me. He raised the question because of this article US Cyber Command calls for offensive powers in Computer Weekly.

    The debate in the US over this request is not over National Interest, or National Security, but over the Legality of offensive operations and some Senior Advisors and Lawyers want to limit such operations to existing War Zones, such as Afghanistan.

    I see this as somewhat 'out-dated thinking' Cyber-war can be waged without forces deployed in the field and a state, or indeed individuals can mount an attempted Cyber Attack without escalation to a Military Deployment. Perhaps the 'rules of cyber engagement' should be no 'First Strike' and that any offensive response against the perpetrators  of an attack should 'be measured' and except in exceptional cases Politically Approved by the Prime Minister, or in the case of the USA the president/ This would seem to me to be a reasonable base line posture to adopt for UK, USA, NATO Countries and indeed other Western Nations.

    I would be interested in comments

    Monday, November 01, 2010

    The Parcel Bomb Attacks - Failure, or Win?

    Despite the apparent sophistication of the Devices, the attack using Parcel Bombs Carried on Aircraft has, at least so far failed, or has it?

    Even though detected, due the Media frenzy Worldwide a classic climate of Fear, Uncertainty & Doubt (FUD) has been generated, this in it's self could be considered a win by those who planned/authorised the attacks. There is nothing new about Parcel Bombs and other than these were designed to explode in Flight, were a reversion to 'old school terrorism'. What has changed is the way the Media now 'spin' such stories.

    When Intelligence and Security services foil a planned attack without publicity, the Terror Planners, may, or may not learn a useful lesson from the failure, but there is no getting away from the fact it was a failure.

    But when as in this case, the plan fails, but does so under the spotlight of intense Media Interest (almost obsessive analysis of every aspect) then the failure can be turned in to a PR win. Actually killing people can rebound by hardening the resolve of the targeted Nation, or Culture, but not killing anyone whilst reinforcing the possibility of at anytime doing so, generates the Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt.

    Also the Media demands action, leading to Politicians having to react publicly and immediately, which can in turn result in unfortunate statements being made and possibly counterproductive reactive action being ordered.

    I find causalities from IEDs tragic, but the IRA were using remotely detonated roadside devices 30+ years ago, parcel/letter bombs have been used by many groups , again including the IRA, even bombs on Aircraft predate Lockerbie by decades. What has changed is the way the Media Report these events (actually report is often an incorrect term, express opinions that they may not be qualified to give, is too often the case). It is fair to say groups such as Al-Qaeda has learned that in many ways the Western Media, due to the way they react to events, useful in assisting in raising the climate of Fear, Uncertainty & Doubt.

    It probably why, although individual Journalists and film units have been targeted, no attacks have been launched against News Media Studios and Headquarters.

    A cynical update of the view: 'A capitalist is someone who sells you the rope with which you then hang him', could be rewritten as 'The Western News Media's way of reporting, assists in the destruction of their way of life'.

    Link to an Article in Aircargo News 02nd November 2010: Bomb plot fails but terror still rules

    Saturday, September 11, 2010

    The United Kingdom Extradition Review

    I welcome the Independent Extradition Review which in particular will put the current US-UK Extradition Treaty of 2003, the European Arrest Warrant and the more general EU Extradition arrangements under the Microscope, but will also cover Extradition Treaties with other Jurisdictions.

    Starting off with the US-UK Extradition Treaty, which despite US Assertions that it fair, is probably one the most unbalanced negotiated by Britain in recent times, even the then Home Secretary David Blunkett (merely one of a long line of pretty useless Home Office Ministers) now admits he may have 'given too much to the Americans', NOT just an understatement, but 7 years late and an indication that David Blunkett should never have been Home Secretary (or indeed a Minister of the Crown in any capacity).

    The trigger for putting the US-UK Treaty as a major element of the review appears to be the case of Gary McKinnon, who as far as I am concerned is one case where the Treaty has a value
    (See: Extradite Gary McKinnon, no problem. But now let's fix the Extradition Treaty Posted 1st August 2009). But this Blog has been highlighting what I see as the failings of this treaty since 2006. See:
    Moving on to the European Arrest Warrant; when this became law, I saw this in general as a good thing and conceptually I still do. But the reality has shown that it is open to being abuse and that it needs urgent reform. Part of the problem is this is an EU Law and therefore allows the Home Secretary, or their equivalent in other EU Countries, no 'wriggle room' to deal with Warrants that fall outside what is compatible with UK Law.

    Whilst it is right that European Arrest Warrant is put under the Microscope, it is actually only part of a wider problem and this is the all encompassing EU Human Rights Legislation. Once again a pan-European Bill of Human rights is conceptually a good idea, but it terms and conditions are so aimed at the rights of the individual, they ignore the rights of society and indeed the rights of states to try Defendants according to their laws. See: Judge Determines Man is a Security Threat, but will NOT deport Him! This treaty does not need to be reviewed, Britain should withdraw from it immediately and replace it with a properly constructed UK Bill of Human Rights where the rights of the Individual and the rights of Society are balanced (Unfortunately my distrust of British Politicians has reached the point that I doubt they could actually construct such a bill).

    The two threads of this post so far came together in the case of the extradition to the US on terror charges of radical cleric Abu Hamza al-Masri and three other men, which I covered in this post: How Dare the EU Block Abu Hamza US extradition on the 10th July 2010.

    Even just reviewing the US-UK Extradition Treaty and the European Arrest Warrant would require considerable time, regardless of how qualified the Review Team might be. Adding in (quite rightly) other Extradition treaties and Arrangements means that the current Home Secretary's statement that this review will not report for a year is reasonable. But this statement is in itself unsatisfactory, as it doesn't address what needs to be done in the interim. My view is that the United Kingdom should suspend both the US-UK Treaty and the European Arrest Warrant and go further and withdraw Britain's acceptance of the Jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights until further notice.

    With any decent Home Secretary this would actually resolve some issues with the USA as both Gary Mckinnon and Abu Hamza (and his associates) would be extradited anyway. But instead we have the permanently disappointed Theresa May (If only Dr John Reid had felt able to stay as Home Secretary, we would have at least a Home Office fit for purpose even if the current Home Secretary wasn't). Of course with the 'beloved Theresa' in charge nothing will happen!

    Saturday, July 10, 2010

    How Dare the EU Block Abu Hamza US extradition

    The European Court of Human Rights has ordered a halt to the extradition to the US on terror charges of radical cleric Abu Hamza al-Masri and three other men.

    Excuse Me...Whilst I loathe the 2003 Extradition Treaty between the USA and UK because of its imbalance, this Treaty was entered into by the Elected Government of the Sovereign United Kingdom. I don't remember voting, for, or against this law being subordinate to bunch of European Judges.

    Abu Hamza, jailed in the UK for soliciting to murder and racial hatred, and three other British men complained about the length of sentence they may face if convicted in the US. Their cases will be delayed for further submissions to the Strasbourg court. Meanwhile the men will remain in Custody in the UK.

    Once again the 2003 Extradition Treaty is actually being used for the purpose the British thought it was supposed to serve.

    The US is seeking to extradite Abu Hamza, the former head of Finsbury Park mosque in north London, since 2004, saying that he had attempted to set up a terrorism training camp in Oregon. The three other men facing extradition are Babar Ahmad, Syed Ahsan and Haroon Rashid Aswat. Mr Ahmad and Mr Ahsan were allegedly involved in raising funds for extremists. Mr Aswat is accused in relation to the alleged terror camp.

    In all these cases the request is reasonable as these men will have their 'Day in a US Court'. But despite the fact they have not even faced trial in the USA, the EU Judges feel that these men have a reasonable argument in that:
    They face a very long sentence in a "supermax" prison in Colorado and these very long sentences and the conditions of the prison, ADX Florence, would breach their human rights.

    So everthing is being delayed whilst these Legal Eagles see more detailed arguments on
    the prison conditions and the effect of the length of sentences. The UK government must submit further arguments to the court by 2 September about why it should be allowed to extradite the four. Sorry No - Two British courts have already approved the extraditions and that is that - The EU Court should keep out of this.

    Now I might have a smidgen of sympathy if they were going to serve their sentence in Ikeja Jail, Nigeria, or were going to enjoy the pleasure of serving time in an Algerian Prison (but then again probably not).

    But my real ire is that the British Government is being told what to do by a group of Judges who obviously live in a world completely Separate from the real one and more concerned with the rights of those, who given the chance would impose laws that would trample over everyone's Human Rights!

    Our 'beloved' Home Secretary Theresa May said: ""We note that the European Court of Human Rights has decided that all the applications are partly admissible. We await the court's
    judgement on the case. In the meantime these individuals will remain in custody."
    Gosh Theresa you are a real wimp aren't you. Tell them we will extradite and that is that!

    Treaties can be torn up, and it is time the EU Human Rights Treaty was!
    However the 2003 Extradition Treaty also needs to be urgently renegotiated, but that has been covered several times in the blog!

    Friday, July 09, 2010

    Abid Naseer - Extradite Him - Part 1

    Back in May Abid Naseer won his appeal against deportation from the UK back to Pakistan despite the Judge noting that he: "posed and still poses a serious threat to the national security of the United Kingdom". But despite this, he was NOT deported because of Human Rights Issues (See: Judge Determines Man is a Security Threat, but will NOT deport Him!).

    However it appears that this Terrorist is not just a threat to the United Kingdom, but has also been involved in Plots against the United States and therefore the US Justice Department issued a Warrant for his arrest in relation to the failed plot to bomb the New York subway and requested his extradition under the 2003 Treaty US-UK Treaty (Nice to see it being used properly).

    So Abid Naseer was arrested and taken to London for a late night court appearance on the 7th July and remanded in Custody until 14 July to allow Mr Naseer to consult lawyers over a possible bail application. The actual Extradition hearing will not take place until 8 September, when a judge will decide if Mr Naseer, 24, can be extradited. After this Home Secretary Theresa May will have the final say.

    My views are naively simple:
    1. He should have been deported back in May, his Human Rights are much less  important than the Human Rights of United Kingdom Citizens
    2. Whilst I loathe the 2003 US-UK Treaty on Extradition for is imbalance, on this occasion it is being used for the correct purpose and he should be extradited by this Weekend, not dragging the process out to September.
    I have a feeling this might 'run and run' hence Part 1 in the title:

    External Links:
    BBC: Terror suspect Abid Naseer held on US warrant
    Independent: Terror suspect Abid Naseer arrested over US warrant
    Telegraph: Terror Suspect Who Couldnt be Deported is Arrested.

    Internal Links:
    Judge Determines Man is a Security Threat, but will NOT deport Him!
    May 2010

    UK-US Extradition Treaty & Certain American Politicians Support for Terrorists
    August 2006

    Wednesday, March 03, 2010

    United Airlines Did Him Wrong so a wrote a trilogy of Songs

    When United Airlines Loading Staff broke singer/songwriter Dave Carroll's $3,500 Taylor Guitar by throwing it about (along with the bands other instruments) and then wouldn't pay compensation. Well in his final email to them, he advised he was going to write and produce three songs which then form the Music to three Videos which would then be posted online. The third song was released on the 2nd March:

    United Breaks Guitars Song 3 - "United We Stand" on the Right Side of Right

    To see all three videos in one place go to: United Airlines did him wrong, so he wrote a song (or three)!, Originally posted in July 2009 with the first Video, updated with the second video and now the final one in the trilogy!




    Friday, January 01, 2010

    The Soldiers Memorial to Their Fallen:

    Michael Yon has been spending time with the US Army 1-17th Infantry Battalion, 5th Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division much of it at a the small base at Arghandab in Afghanistan, which sits on the bordeline of 'friendly' and 'enemy' territory.

    His blog article on New years Eve 2009 entitled: Into Thine Hand I Commit My Spirit is dedicated to a Memorial Tepee that has been erected just next to the Chapel. Inside the tepee are 21 photos of 21 soldiers killed during the first months of a year-long tour of duty. Michael has illustrated his article with a series of extremely evocative photographs, most of which were taken at night. Whilst I urge you to read the Article, I could not resist including three of the Photographs (I just hope he doesn't mind):


    Mostly there is silence.

    Sometimes the soldiers walk by carrying lights that are red or green, or sometimes white. Tonight, Cobra Battery was firing illumination rounds from the cannons, which boom from the darkness, arcing a round into the night, where miles away a canister unsheathes, and the parachute opens, and brightness floats silently, shimmering over the valley where these soldiers died.


    Soldiers put cigarettes in front of each photo, though they say that many of the fallen did not smoke.

    Wednesday, December 02, 2009

    A strong City is not just in Britain's interests

    The Author of this Article, Mark Jago is a semi-regular contributor to this Blog, however his insights on issues of the day, are to be increasing found in the comments section of articles published online by the better UK Newspapers.

    The above headline is borrowed from an article written by the Chancellor of the Exchequer Alistair Darling on the 2nd December 2009 in the online Times paper laying out a case for the City of London to remain a prominent European financial center.   This is in response to City concerns about Gordon Browns agreeing to new European market oversight and the appointment of Michel Barnier as the new EU Single Market Commissioner to oversee regulatory reform.   It makes an interesting read into the thinking of a Government attempting to create an impression that is 180 degrees out of step with reality.
    You can read the article here: A strong City is not just in Britain's interests

    The Chancellor fails to mention that the Royal Bank of Scotland was allowed by his Government to leverage itself up to become the world’s largest bank with perhaps the largest exposure to toxic mortgage assets.  Also that Banks outside the UK and US were the victims of US and UK financial policies of exporting systemic risk which caused the freezing and failure of the world economy.  While he talks about having a safe market place, financial regulation and ensuring taxpayers and customers do not pay for bank failures.  We all know that he and his Government have created an environment where the opposite is true.  In terms of doing business in the UK companies, small business, investors and customers face a very high risk of loss due to the Government and financial industry.

    With the advent of online electronic banking there is now little reason to use UK institutions. Companies and traders can trade stocks 24/7 on various exchanges around the world.  Large corporate funding is generally funded by multiple Banks and can be arranged in jurisdictions like Canada where there is better downside protection against systemic risk.  By any measure given the current UK economic and political situation the cost of doing business in the UK could turn out to be an unacceptable risk.  It remains to be seen if Europe is willing to take on the City once they have a full understanding of the risks involved.

    My comment as published the Times is as follows
    :
     It's simply stunning to see that people are still attempting to rewrite history in order to carry on as before.   The world made the mistake in putting its trust in the large UK and the US financial centers.

    It was debt issued through these financial centers classified by their regulators as AAA that turned out to be toxic.  This debt contained risky packaged mortgages that were sold in a similar way that resulted in the previous failure of the London insurance market.  Mortgage brokers were paid large fees to sell mortgages to people who had no hope of even being able to pay the interest on the loan.   The world made the mistake in putting its trust in the large UK and the US financial centers.

    The US and UK Governments were instigators who dismantled financial oversight.  They miss-managed their economies and created the housing bubbles that caused the financial crisis and recession.  Both countries have massive Government borrowing requirements facilitated by funding through their financial centres.  In simple terms they have built a money machine that takes the wealth created by ordinary people around the world and concentrates it in the hands a few greedy advantaged individuals in London and New York.

    Had there been a shred of honesty within the institutions of this land there should have been an admission of fault and help for the honest people and businesses that have been damaged by their actions.   As usual Government politicians have put their own interests ahead of those of the country and deflected responsibility by blaming others, stonewalling and whitewashing the facts.

    The City would have you think that they are an indispensible part of the world economy. In fact they have brought about their own eventual demise.



    Saturday, November 28, 2009

    The Extradite Gary McKinnon Saga Continues

    My views on the Gary McKinnon Case and the Extradition Treaty were detailed on the 01st August 2009 in this post.
    Extradite Gary McKinnon, no problem. But now let's fix the Extradition Treaty
    Even the Home Secretary after reversing his decision to not to review the case (U-Turns being one of the few things British Ministers seem good at), has found that there are NO valid reasons to stop the extradition.

    As a reminder on what this is all about:
    Gary McKinnon hacked into 97 Computers belonging to:
    United States Defense Department, US Navy, US Army, US Air Force, and NASA in the months after the Sept. 11 attacks. In the process of causing (by latest figures) $700,000USD of Damage, and stole 1,000 passwords from high-security computer networks.

    He has admitted he did indeed commit these crimes, but only because he was looking for information on U.F.O.’s. Hmm, if this was indeed his only agenda, why did he leave the following message on one of the Pentagon computers he hacked:
    “U.S. foreign policy is akin to government-sponsored terrorism. I will continue to disrupt at the highest possible level.”

    The Lawyers acting for the US in the Extradition Case have described Mr McKinnon as:
    The most prolific and damaging computer hacker in the history of the United States military.
    Well I would change the wording to:
    The most prolific and damaging, non-state supported computer hacker in the history of the United States military, that has been caught so far.
    But then these are only Lawyers and what do they know about Cyber-Espionage being carried out against all Western Countries Military and Industry.
    But despite this caveat, the crimes committed mean Gary McKinnon was carrying out acts of Cyber-Terrorism against the USA.

    But hold on, a Professor watching a Television Interview  being given by McKinnon after extradition proceedings had started, began to suspect that he was suffering from Asperger syndrome, and subsequently he was indeed diagnosed as a sufferer of this disorder in August 2008 (three years into the Extradition proceedings). Asperger Syndrome is viewed as being within the Autism Spectrum of Disorders and is the cause of much discussion amongst researchers and indeed sufferers whether it is a difference (i.e within the spectrum of normal behaviour), rather than a disability that must be treated or cured.

    As covered in my earlier post, Gary McKinnon does seem to fit some of the Asperger Profile, but surely this should have been diagnosed in Childhood when the symptoms are more pronounced rather than in his early 40's. Also within Asperger, like any of the disorders within the Autism Spectrum, there are huge variations between individuals.
    If Asperger's is a valid defence, then there is no reason why this would not be considered as valid in a US Court as in a UK one?
    Alternatively now that it is known that in Gary McKinnon case Asperger's is so serious that his obsessive behaviour meant that he went out and attacked the systems of a British Ally, then why hasn't he been sectioned under the Mental Health Acts and currently in a secure facility and (as there is nor real treatment) confined there for the rest of his life?

    A lot of People from the British Autism Society to a bunch of Cross-party MP's and 'Celebrities' have jumped on the Save Gary McKinnon bandwagon. At least in the case of the British Autism Society, I have some sympathy with their stance as for the rest, well..

    The only Person for whom I have both sympathy and respect in this case is Gary McKinnon's Mother, Janis Sharp who has mounted one of the most impressive campaigns in support of her son that I have ever known. Having said that, I believe her campaign should fail and that Gary McKinnon's case be heard in an American Court on the eight counts of computer fraud, that the extradition request is connected with.

    But this does NOT in any way change my views on the 2003 Extradition Treaty. It is one of a small number of issues where I agree with Shami Chakrabarti (I respect and admire the Lady, just don't often agree with her) that this Extradition Law is in need of urgent reform. I would go further, in the next parliament the Treaty should be revoked and whilst renegotiated replaced by Extradition on a case by case basis.
    See:UK-US Extradition Treaty and Certain American Politicians Support for Terrorists Posted on 13th August 2006 .
    After all one of the reasons it is so imbalanced is the concern that members of the IRA living in the US would not be given a fair trail if extradited to Britain and one of the concerns of the British Supporters of Gary Mckinnon is that he won't get a fair trial in the USA, I trust US Justice the same as I trust British Justice, I view both with considerable reservations, but they both attempt to give defendants a fair trial - My Objection to the NatWest Three being extradited, was their case clearly fell within British Jurisdiction and due the intense anger over Enron, there was a possibility of trial bias. But the reason that I support Gary McKinnon's Extradition is treaty, or not, this case falls within US Jurisdiction and there is NOT the same US Domestic angst.

    Monday, September 07, 2009

    Michael Yon with British Troops in Helmand

    Michael Yon who?
    American Citizen and former United States Army Green Beret, turned Author and Reporter. He recently spent approximately a month with British Forces (for whom he has a lot of respect) in Helmand Province and spent his time living and patrolling with the 2nd Rifles (a Unit he had previously spent time with in Iraq). His stay would have been longer, but the Ministry of Defence (bless them) took umbrage at this report Michael filed on the 24th August 2009 entitled: Bad Medicine

    However an even more interesting Blog Post was made on the 31st August and although it discusses the Afghan Elections as a future event (and was posted after they were held) is a must read for the realities of the War in Afghanistan: Precision Voting

    Michael is moving on, but not back home, instead now trying to get permission to embed with US Forces. In the meantime he has filed a story that was published in the New York Daily News on the 6th September:
    New Afghan war: Frontline correspondent says fight has morphed – but we still can't afford to lose
    This makes sombre reading (especially from a British prespective), but is an article that it is too important to ignore.

    Update: 08th September 2009 Another fascinating article on being with the British Troops in Helmand. Although posted today. the article is based on a patrol just prior to his permission to remain with British Forces was revoked. The title of the Article is Misleading, but it is really worth reading: Eight Years After 9/11



    Thursday, August 27, 2009

    Who Mourns Senator Kennedy? - Not I

    Senator Edward Kennedy died on the 25 August 2009. I will not mourn him, but his death has reminded me to mourn for the British Soldiers and Civilians killed, or maimed in Northern Ireland during Senator Kennedy's 30 year support of Terrorism in the United Kingdom Province of Northern Ireland and his positive encouragement to Americans to give money to the 'cause', which misguidedly they did, to the tune of Hundreds of Millions of Dollars.

    During the troubles, it became a tradition for Fenian murderers to routinely feted on St Patrick’s Day by members of the US political establishment , and no American Politician welcomed them more warmly than Senator Edward Kennedy:



    Whenever Margaret Thatcher visited Washington, Senator Kennedy could always be seen wearing a bright green tie, an unsubtle ''statement'' on his part of his support for Republicanism - something which the then Prime Minister was always aware of but chose to ignore (also a sign of how he retained a very 'juvenile outlook', even in late middle-age).

    After 9/11 when even the Irish-American Romantics discovered what Terrorism really means and the mood in Northern Ireland Politics was changing, like any Political Animal, Senator Kennedy sniffed the wind and changed his Public Stance.

    His public change of heart, positively supporting the peace process, even going so far as to publicly snub Jerry Adams, won him many plaudits, an even if in the unlikely event this change was real (and I doubt his views actually change one iota) it cannot expunge the previous 30 years.

    Maybe Senator Kennedy was a good Servant to his Country on Domestic Issues, from here, he was a bigoted supporter of Terrorism.

    As for his very public, Private Life: A man who if he had not been a Kennedy, would have likely faced extremely serious charges in connection with the death of Mary Jo Kopechne in 1969 in the 'Chappaquiddick Incident' (instead receiving a two month suspended sentence for leaving the scene), but even after this he continued to lead a lifestyle which would have shamed a juvenile-celebrity right through until the end of the 1980's.

    The fact that an Honourary Knighthood was given to a man who had inherited his fathers loathing for Britain, supported Terrorism and was without doubt flawed in so many other ways, is a stain on my nations honour.

    But he now faces the ultimate judgement, fortunately for him God is all forgiving. But it is going to be a very long time before I forgive his support of terrorism in my country.

    Wednesday, August 19, 2009

    United Airlines did him wrong, so he wrote a song and now a second one

    When United Airlines Loading Staff broke singer/songwriter Dave Carroll's $3,500 Taylor Guitar by throwing it about (along with the bands other instruments) and then wouldn't pay compensation. Well in his final email to them, he advised he was going to write and produce three songs which then form the Music to three Videos which would then be posted online. See the Post: United Airlines did him wrong, so he wrote a song (or three)! Which has both Videos released so far and slightly more detailed background and links.

    For those who have followed the saga and want to see the second Video NOW, well here it is:
    United Breaks Guitars Song 2:
    For more information on the making of United Breaks Guitars: Song 2 on Dave Carroll's Site.

    Enjoy!

    Update 27th August 2009: I have just seen this article on ZDNet (USA) which gives United yet another PR Headache:
    Deconstructing United Airlines: Where Customers are Transactions

    Saturday, August 01, 2009

    Extradite Gary McKinnon, no problem. But now let's fix the Extradition Treaty

    The Idle Man has followed the Gary McKinnon Hacker Case with some interest, but with little sympathy for Mr McKinnon. After all he is not being accused of some minor misdemeanour, but of hacking into the computer systems of the United States Army, Navy and Air Force, plus the United States Department of Defence and NASA, as well as sabotaging vital American military systems after the terror attacks of September 11 2001. In addition McKinnon is alleged to have caused Criminal Damage by his actions, which have been calculated to total $750,000 USD for remedial action and repair. Any Government would, based on these allegations go to any lengths for extradition and subsequent prosecution.

    In the UK a large number of high profile people and much of the media are stating that the current extradition treaty should NOT apply in this case as it was designed to counter terrorism. From the viewpoint of any Government, the allegations against Gary McKinnon are effectively charges of Terrorism, although prefixed with cyber. But make no mistake Cyber Terrorism may not have the instant, spectacular media impact of a Bomb Attack but if it is successful, it can easily be just as dangerous to society.

    Apparently Mr McKinnon has been diagnosed with Asperger syndrome which even the medical profession cannot spell consistently and whilst McKinnon appears to in part fit the Asperger profile, in other areas it appears from the background to the case he does not (social interaction does not appear to have been impaired and he has even been part of the Hackers Panel at InfoSecurity Europe). What makes Asperger syndrome even more interesting is that there is now discussion as to whether this is a disability that must be treated, or a just a 'difference' that falls with the spectrum of normal Human behaviour. So using the Asperger defence always seemed more than a little disingenuous.

    So as far as I am concerned the McKinnon Allegations do fall within the original purpose and spirit of the Extradition Treaty and whilst my view counts for nothing, it has been supported in Law up to and including the Law Lords and the European Court of Human Rights, which have rejected his appeal against extradition.

    What I find ironic is that this fast-track Treaty has occupied the Legal Profession for three years! When for once it was actually being used for the purpose for which, at least the British thought it was designed. Of course because of the implicit imbalance to the treaty, if an American Hacker had done the same to the MoD, MI5, or SIS Systems, Britain would NOT under the treaty have able to extradite them.

    Now the obstacles to Gary McKinnon being extradited, there will be a jury trial under the American Justice System. So Gary McKinnon will have his 'day in court'(although I suspect this will actually be weeks in Court). There are four possible outcomes:
    1. He will be found guilty of all charges and if this is the case a very long sentence is appropriate.
    2. He will be found guilty of some of the charges and if is the case the sentence should appropriate to those he is found guilty of.
    3. His Lawyers will successfully use the Asperger defence, but hopefully this will still mean he will be institutionalised for a period for assessment to ensure he is not going to repeat his actions.
    4. He is found not guilty of all charges - Extremely Unlikely!
    Whilst I have every sympathy with McKinnon's Mother attempts to stop her son being extradited (and indeed have much more sympathy for her tireless efforts than I have for her Son), I find it embarrassing and distasteful that 40 British Members of Parliament have, after the Legal Processes have been exhausted have jumped on the McKinnon bandwagon by writing to the US President. Their protest is NOT about whether after a Trial he is found guilty and the punishment is too harsh, but the fact that he should NOT stand trial at all. If these allegations are true and this man attacked an ally and compromised their national security then it is only right that the USA should have the right to try him for these Crimes. True he is being extradited under a flawed and imbalanced treaty, but these MPs efforts would be better served by NOT using the case for self-serving publicity, but working hard to get the provisions of the Treaty fixed, so that there is no imbalance and it limited to the purposes that the British Government believed it would be applied! In the case of McKinnon, the treaty (flawed though it is) has been correctly applied.

    The Idle Man, is as so often the case, is apparently out of step with Media and Political Opinion (what the general public thinks, matters not one jot - After all the e-Petition to the Prime Minister to stop the extradition, only managed to obtain 876 Signatures before it closed, not exactly an outpouring of support). So be it, but I consider what Gary McKinnon is alleged to have done, constitutes extremely serious crimes against an ally of this country and he should stand trial for those crimes in the country against which he launched his attacks, But that does not in any way alter my view that the current extradition treaty should be suspended until the provisions of the treaty between UK and USA apply equally to both Countries. This should not stop the Gary McKinnon Extradition because the Legal Processes were finally taken to the European Court of Human Rights and the extradition was upheld (quite rightly).

    In the interests of Balance here are three of External Websites that show support for Gary McKinnon's attempts to avoid Extradition and Trial in the USA:
    Free Gary McKinnon - or at least give him a fair trial in the United Kingdom - Blog
    Daily Mail Articles in Support of Gary McKinnon
    London TV Net

    About that Extradition Treaty:
    Posts in this Blog:
    UK-US Extradition Treaty and Certain American Politicians Support for Terrorists - 13th August 2003
    The NatWest Three - 29th November 2007

    External Sites:
    Extradition Act of 2003 - The UK Statute Law Database
    The Extradition Act 2003 - Wikipedia Entry
    StateWatch News Online – Special Report on the ‘New US_UK Extradition Treaty - 2003
    MPs Impotently Huffing and Puffing in Parliament - Hansard via They Work for You - 15th July 2009

    News Update:
    Alan Johnson: I can’t stop extradition - Times Online 2nd August 2009:
    In this article the Home Secretary states he cannot stop the extradition as he would be breaking the Law. However once again Gary McKinnon is described as young (he is 43, which means he should be described as of middle age), Vulnerable (so vulnerable he can sit on the InfoSecurity Hackers panel and give a number of media interviews) and Misguided (He certainly is, he got so overconfident whilst hacking into US Defence Computers and those of NASA that he misguidedly got careless and therefore got caught).

    I would rather the Home Secretary concentrated on making his Department 'fit for purpose' and ensuring that illegals are deported, dangerous prisoners stay in jail and sorting out the totally mismanaged National ID Card Scheme, than writing articles for the Sunday Times.



    Thursday, July 23, 2009

    United Airlines did him wrong, so he wrote a song (or three)!


    Post Updated on the 3rd March 2010 to cover the entire trilogy of Songa/Videos:

    When United Airlines Loading Staff broke singer/songwriter Dave Carroll's $3,500 Taylor Guitar by throwing it about (along with the bands other instruments), he started what should have been a simple compensation claim, which ended NINE MONTHS later with United Airlines final refusal to pay compensation, So in his very last email to United Airlines he said he would write and produce three songs about his experience with United Airlines and make videos for each to be viewed online by anyone in the world.

    This is the first of these videos - United Breaks Guitars :


    The sorry tale in both short and long forms is here: United Breaks Guitars
    There is also a video statement from Dave Carroll

    Here is the Second Video: United Breaks Guitars Song 2:


    For more information on the making of United Breaks Guitars: Song 2 on Dave Carroll's Site.

    The third and final Song/Video was released on the 2nd March 2010 and here it is:


    United Breaks Guitars Song 3 - "United We Stand" on the Right Side of Right




    Friday, May 08, 2009

    Fundamental Political change is critically needed in the UK

    An Article by: Mark Jago - Published with his permission
    The Opinions Expressed are those of the Author
    .

    I hate to say that I told you so, if you read my article posted here on the 5th of January about how the Governments inept credit crises policies are inflicting social and economic damage. You will begin to understand why day by day their fiddling is the root cause of the continuing economic implosion. Exposing the fundamental flaws of a supposedly benign benevolent state and laying bare a corrupt political culture that has led the country to the edge of a cataclysmic economic and social collapse.

    Such is the entrenchment of the states misguided policies, culture and philosophises that UK society over decades has become indoctrinated, compliant and resigned to accept a miserable existence that is the lot of the majority of UK citizens. It's not until you move away and live outside the UK do you begin to understand how its society has been deceived by a system that rewards only a select few.

    There are simple questions that in an ethical society have simple answers. Basically we hold people to account for their actions and expect a certain level of responsibility in the way we conduct our daily lives. If you apply these questions to the government it's clear that the government is giving money to thieves who have been systematically stealing it aided and abetted by its own dismantling of ethical safeguards. Unlike professional engineers, architects and doctors, politicians are not held accountable for the damage inflicted by their selfish, short sighted and inept political decisions. The government continues to metaphorically hold their citizens hands in the fire giving them little or no opportunity to exercises their democratic rights to oppose its undemocratic rule.

    Democracy is a form of government in which state-power is held by the majority of citizens within a country. For this to be affective all members of the society (citizens) should have equal access to power and all members (citizens) must be able to enjoy universally recognized freedoms and liberties.

    By any moral standards the UK is a non democratic centralistic dictatorship where there is no charter of freedoms and rights afforded equally to all members of society. In a democratic society politicians get replaced when they don't perform up to expectations. In a democratic society governments regularly get dissolved and new elections held when they fail to live up their democratic mandate.

    The behaviour of the current government can only be classified as disgusting and by any measure it fails measurably to act in the best interests of its citizens. There is a litany of indicators that classify it amongst the most oppressive regimes in the world.

    The classic indicators of dictatorships are as follows:
    • A regime that is obsessed with its own security, feels the need to prioritize military expenditures over the economic well being of the country. It's a bully that justifies its interference into other countries affairs and dictates policy which it has no intention of following itself. Two examples are the invasion of Iraq and the continued investments in nuclear submarine weapons. A nuclear deterrent is not a viable option in a country that where a large portion of the population are former citizens of 140 countries. In a country that is increasing reliant on potential antagonist countries for its energy, its economic well being and for food imports.
    • A regime that feels threatened by its own citizens and attempts to micro manage every aspect of their daily lives. Implements laws that restrict citizen's rights and freedoms, uses excessive surveillance to keep track on them and encourages government bodies to snoop on them and to harass them. Curtails the freedom of their citizens to voice objections and uses excessive policing tactics to manage and unlawfully detain protesters. The policing of the G20 protests is a good example of this where violence with initially instigated by the police, individual police identity numbers were hidden and protesters were greatly outnumbered by the police and unlawfully detained.
    • It's a regime that institutes a confusing array of laws which it then selectively enforces to create a dual class society with an un-equal recourse to justice for the majority. Typically the victim is punished and the perpetrators are sheltered from prosecution and or punishment. Malpractice in the police force, health service, government departments and banking investment services are examples of this. Look at the news media any day and incompetence and malpractice has become common to the point that public has become "tuned out" to the abuses. An example this week is the trial of three legal immigrant's that made millions by forging immigration papers and qualifications that the home office didn't bother to check rubber stamping hundreds maybe thousands of legal immigrant's entry into the UK.
    • Typically dictator regimes are grossly incompetent and have an incestuous relationship with various levels financial and government institutions. The people in charge are usually poorly qualified and too busy looking after their selfish needs to manage proper oversight of the areas under their control. These people can be identified easily by the way that they reward themselves with bonuses, perks and large guaranteed pensions. While they at the same time ensure that legitimate business and workers pay the consequences for the regimes incompetence with the loss of their business, jobs, homes and pensions. For those who remain solvent is the cost of living and running a business is constantly increased with additional taxes to make up for the short fall of government funds. The announced autumn increase in Petrol tax is one is just one example of this.
    • Particularly sleazy dictator regimes portray themselves as democracies. These can be identified by the way their version of democracy is managed.

      Typically a cosy relationship between two parties, perks and pensions tend to be similar for the opposition, less hassle and more time to enjoy life. The opposition is weak and ineffective and offers little alternatives to voters.

      The opportunity to vote and who to vote for is kept to a minimum. A vote once every five years for a small number of representatives in proportion to the population for party pre-screened preselected candidates that will follow party lines with little effective democratic choice exercised.

      Power is tightly held by a very few powerful people. The Prime Minister being selected by the ruling party and positions of power are given out at his discretion in a way that consolidates his own power base.

      Elected cabinet members are outnumbered by powerful non elected civil servants and other non elected members such those that the government have selected to be members of House of Lords.

      It is in affect an exclusive club that rewards its members well for keeping the status quo going. Increasingly, powerful politicians are selected to cabinet by Prime Ministers having them made members of the House of Lords and circumventing the need to call a by-election and a voter mandate.

      In Parliament question time is a choreographed event designed to give an impression of democracy that in effect does not exist. Creating a democratically elected House of Lords is example of a government policy talked about and never implemented.
    Recent events in the United States of America with the election of a new President prove that democracy however biased in favour of a rich and powerful corporate élite can be won back by grass roots citizen activists. President Barack Obama and his team are working very quickly to put right the excessive abuses of the previous republican administration. Unlike the UK, elections in the USA are held every two years and power is overwhelmingly held by democratically elected officials with power being shared by the members of the House of Representatives, the Congress and the President. Powerful positions held by non elected officials have to be confirmed with public hearings in the House of Representatives and Congress. These posts are normally only held for the period that the President remains in power, the President not being allowed to serve more than two four year terms. The President recently "opened the door" to holding members of the previous administration legally responsible for the abuses perpetrated by their administration.

    The current UK government and previous US administration were co instigators of deregulation with the removal safeguards that were implemented to curb the fraudulent excesses post to the nineteen thirties US financial collapse and depression. The UK and USA governments used their dominance in the world financial markets to gain benefit from fraudulent financial manipulation of the markets and to make easy money available to create a housing bubble in their countries. Those policies sparked the global financial crisis and economic meltdown. The UK financial markets were active participants in creating the commodities bubble by buying commodities, taking them out of the consumer markets ensuring that prices went up and then selling into an inflated market. The dumping of these investments contributed to the collapse of the oil markets and North Sea energy industry*

    As expected the government has now resorted to having the Bank of England print money to keep the economy afloat. My previous blog reported that the UK due to reckless government policies will suffer a deeper recession for longer than other most other world economies. Also that inflation would be the nail in the coffin that seals the fate of the UK. These things are coming to pass with the upturn in China trade and the bottoming and signs of a turnaround in the US economy.

    The government will quickly find that the US is no longer interested in a special relationship with the UK. The world is no longer interested in paying for the UK's free lunch, the party is over. It will be interesting to see if the British public is willing to accept the UK becoming an African like failed state, or take to the streets in protest like the citizens of other European states are expected to do this summer?

    The Idle Man Notes:
    I hope this article generates a range of comments, it is both provocative as well as thought provoking.

    Other Articles by Mark Jago on this blog:


    05th January 2009:
    Banks Risk Scottish North Sea Oil industry and Britain's Energy Future
    This is referenced twice in the above

    10th February 2009:
    Banks Continued Failure to Provide Loans makes a UK Depression Inevitable

    30th March 2009:
    An intelligent World is no longer fooled by G20 Summit Theatre



    Wednesday, March 11, 2009

    Taliban - Abdullah Ghulam Rasoul FIG

    Abdullah Ghulam Rasoul FIG (Former Inmate Guantanamo) and now using the nom de guerre Mullah Abdullah Zakir, has been identified as the Taliban's Chief of Operations in Southern Afghanistan. His stated mission is to step up Taliban Operations to Counter the US Surge.

    Whilst the Idle Man has long suspected that being a FIG would become a 'badge of honour', like JBB (Jailed By the British) was in the 1950's and 1960's and that a proportion of the former Guantanamo detainees would join/rejoin either Al-Qaeda, or the Taliban after their release (see below).

    But the surfacing of Abdullah Ghulam Rasoul was a surprise, because he wasn't released, but transferred into the custody of the Afghan Governemnt in December 2007 (along with 12 others). Why the Afghan Government released him is a mystery, but a decision that will be paid for by the lives of Afghan and Coalition Service Personnel.

    As for other FIGs resurfacing as Al-Qaeda, or the Taliban Terrorists this is a quote from an Associated Press Article:
    The officials, who spoke anonymously because they are not authorized to release the information, said Rasoul has joined a growing faction of former Guantanamo prisoners who have rejoined militant groups and taken action against U.S. interests. Pentagon officials have said that as many as 60 former detainees have resurfaced on foreign battlefields.
    So it appears the Idle Man's suspicions are confirmed. Another occasion when being correct gives no pleasure at all.

    Also see: Afghan Taliban Leader Was At Gitmo


    Thursday, February 19, 2009

    Moving the US Air 'Hudson River' A320 to a Hangar

    This picture series of 11 Photographs forms a follow-up to the post on the 26th January 2009:
    Recovery of US Air Airbus A320 from the Hudson River

    This post covers the transport of the Aircraft Fuselage through the streets of Red Hook New York State during its transfer to a Hangar for detailed examination:






















    Copyright Unknown.


    Monday, January 26, 2009

    Recovery of US Air Airbus A320 from the Hudson River

    The recovery operation was carried out on the 17th/18th January 2009:








































    Copyright Unknown


    A reminder how the Crash Landing was reported on the 16th January 2009





    There is now a follow-up post covering the Transport of the Fuselage through the streets of Red Hook New York:
    Moving the US Air 'Hudson River' A320 to a Hangar