Showing posts with label Mobile Phones. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mobile Phones. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 09, 2009

UK Population Approx 61 Million - Mobile Phone Subs Approx 76 Million.

The planned merger between Orange and T-Mobile would mean the merged entity would have more than 28 Million Subscribers and a Market Share of 37%.

These numbers mean that in round figures there are 76 Million Mobile Phone Subscribers in the United Kingdom.

So there is one Mobile Subscription for every Man, Woman and Child (including babies), with another 15 Million covering those with Multiple subscriptions, Regular visitors to the UK with a UK Subscription, Inactive Accounts, Illegal Immigrants and Criminal Usage.

Hmm..The numbers are interesting but without a proper breakdown, I cannot reach any sensible conclusion, but I am left with a sense of unease.






Monday, August 17, 2009

Campaign: Reducing UK Mobile-Landline-Mobile Call Charges

In the United Kingdom the real cost of many Telephone Calls whether from a Landline, or a Mobile has fallen over recent times, but there is one 'black spot', called the Mobile Termination Rate which is currently around 4.7p per minute that provides a 'cash cow' for Mobile Network Operators whilst resulting in a nasty surprise for consumers.

The Mobile Termination Rate, normally abbreviated to MTR is applied when a call is made from a Landline to a Mobile, or from a Mobile on one Network to a Mobile on another Network. Now it is fair that some charge is made for this, but 4.7p per minute is to say the least excessive. Therefore the TerminateTheRate Group has been formed to bring pressure to bear on the industry Regulator Ofcom to enforce a lower MTR that reflects the Network Operators actual costs. In part this pressure is to be applied by a Petition to Members of Parliament as well as Ofcom: Petition Form is on the TerminateTheRate Home Page

Outside the UK, the European Commission (EC), flush with success in reducing Mobile Roaming charges, recommended in 2008 that the MTR across EU Countries should fall on average by around 70% in three years (bringing it very close to the Termination Rates applied by Landline Network Operators)..

Would there be any downside to forcing operators in the UK to reduce the MTR they apply dramatically?
Potentially one type of Consumer could indeed be adversely affected this being Prepaid Mobile Users
A Deloitte Report from January 2009, points out that much of the revenue from Prepaid Customers is generated by the MTR, By reducing the MTR, these Customers could move from being a profitable Market to be a loss maker. How much of this is designed to generate FUD (Fear Uncertainty and Doubt) is difficult to gauge, but this market is too important to some major Network Operators to lose, so they will be already working on new methods of both retaining the Prepaid Customers, whilst ensuring that it remains a profitable market.

Returning to the TerminateTheRate Campaign, this has a surprisingly wide range of 'corporate supporters' including:
One Landline Operator (BT), One Mobile Operator (3), Industry groups, Local Authorities, Charities and Trade Unions - A full list of current supporters is here: Campaign Supporters Page 1 and Campaign Supporters Page 2

Having done some research into both sides of the MTR argument, the following are my conclusions:
  1. Mobile Operators are resigned to the MTR being reduced.
  2. Most Mobile Operators want this decline in MTR to be in small steps over a long period.
  3. Business Users in Uk and across Europe find the current MTR rates onerous in the extreme
  4. Consumers in the UK and across Europe don't know about MTR as it is a 'hidden charge' within their call costs, they just see their Operators Rates for Calls, which where applicable include the MTR.
  5. Reducing the MTR dramatically will definitely benefit most Consumers, but has the potential to increase costs to Prepaid Services Users
I will be signing the petition, hopefully this post has provided visitors with sufficient information, to decide if they will to!



Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Mobile Phones on Aircraft: Ryanair Rollout Voice/SMS/Email Services

The news that budget airline Ryanair has started to rollout an in-flight mobile phone voice service should come as no surprise, after all back in 2006 the company announced it would be introducing the service 'soon' . Ryanair is constantly looking at ways to generate additional in-flight revenue and has worked extremely hard to fully understand the services that will sell to its passenger demographic.

It obviously views an early adoption of in-flight voice mobile service as potentially a very profitable revenue stream (early pricing being: £1.50-£3 per minute, text messages at 40p a go and e-mails from £1-£2) and as a bonus using the wide spread reporting of the new service as free advertising.

For the initial phase 20 Aircraft have been equipped for the service, with the remainder of the fleet being refitted over the next 18 Months. The service provider is OnAir and for the ground segment , they have arrangements with 50 mobile phone operators throughout Europe to route call once it leaves the OnAir Network. Currently only one UK Network is signed up, this being O2, but talks with the rest of the major UK Networks are in progress.

Those of you who have followed by previous posts on this subject know that whilst I find the technology fascinating, I am more than a little concerned over the adverse impact on passengers who use the flight part of their journey as 'quiet time' whether for reviewing work, or just relaxing.

Well the introduction of the service is likely to make Ryanair flights louder and more boisterous.
However, Michael O'Leary, the company's chief executive, has little sympathy for passengers trying to catch up on sleep or hoping for a little peace and quiet on their trip:

"I have no patience with the approach that says people don't want to use their mobile phones in-flight," he told The Guardian. "You don't take a flight to contemplate your life in silence. Our services are not cathedral-like sanctuaries. Anyone who looks like sleeping, we wake them up to sell them things."

"We will be encouraging our passengers to make as many calls as possible because that will lower our costs and boost our revenues."

Which really sums up the Ryanair philosophy. With the current economic situation companies are going to further increase the use of Budget Airlines for Business Travel, as most of Ryanair Flights are short haul, Business travellers used to traditional airline service may become irritated, but no more. However for routes that are deemed Medium Haul, being sat next to a 'Mobileholic' could lead to the first instance of Anti-Mobile Rage on an Aircraft - We shall see!

Meanwhile the Idle Man will follow the Ryanair rollout with interest.

Previous Posts on this Subject:

Mobile Phones on Aircraft - Like the Technology - Hate the Consequences 22nd October 2007

Mobile Phones On Aircraft - Update 8th November 2007

Mobile Phones On Aircraft - US Congress to vote on in-flight mobile ban 01st August 2008 (This never went to a full vote and therefore the proposed law was abandoned)


External Links:
Guardian - Ryanair starts in-flight mobile phone service


Telegraph - Ryanair launches mobile phone service

BBC - Ryanair allows mobile phone use



Wednesday, September 03, 2008

Gustav and Civilian Telecommunications

This post is related to my more general comments on the
Handling of the Gustav Hurricane Emergency
Whilst in the US the Emergency Services, Police National Guard and Coastguard, have dedicated Radio Networks and Landlines to maintain their Communications, Civilians are dependent on their normal service providers.

As my interest in telecommunications is both professional and personal, my attention was quickly drawn to an article by:
Rajani Baburajan on TMC Net entitled Service Providers Step up to the Challenges Presented by Hurricane Gustav.

Most of this post is made up of comments on extracts from her article, which starts:
The strength and weaknesses of communications technologies are revealed during disasters. People depend on these technologies during emergencies, and during such times offering flawless services is of utmost concern to providers.
The impact of Hurricane Gustav is the latest example of such a situation. Maintaining telecom infrastructure during hurricanes is a difficult task, made more difficult by increased volume of calls from people checking on friends, colleagues and loved ones in the hurricane zone — volume that can result in overloaded networks.
Extremely well put, I wish I could write as clearly and concisely as Rajani. In the UK we tend to forget how easily Mobile Networks can be overloaded especially when a very large number of simultaneous calls are attempted from the same cellular cluster. In the US this can be exacerbated by operator coverage limitations, which in the UK are only experienced by a relatively small percentage of users regardless of operator.

As for Landline Telephony, both in the US and the UK, there is an almost religious belief we will be able to connect a landline to landline call, but actually this is NOT the case. Whilst landline networks normally have a large contingency volume handling capacity they can under certain circumstance reach this. Especially if there has been damage to local, or enroute network infrastructure. Whilst my limited knowledge of the UK Disaster procedures for Landline Networks is at least 15 Years out of date, I assume the Cascading Priorities still apply with at its most extreme only Government and nationally vital telephone numbers will be allowed to connect calls.

Back to the Gustav Emergency: The two dominant operators in the affect areas are the resurgent AT&T and T-Mobile. Again quoting from Rajani's article:
In anticipation of power outages and network jams that can occur during hurricanes, major service providers including AT&T and T-Mobile this weekend prepared their teams to deal with hurricane Gustav in a competitive manner.
The last two words which I have highlighted caused me to raise an eyebrow! Dealing with a disaster of potentially massive proportions in a competitive manner, hmm, surely this is a typo, obviously this should be cooperative manner.

No it wasn't a mistake as the next few paragraphs relating to AT&T revealed:
AT&T on Sunday announced the availability of more than 2,000 GoPhone devices with $15 airtime to people who were ordered to evacuate. The phones were made available on a first-come first-serve basis to residents who live in areas where mandatory evacuation was ordered.
AT&T distributed the phones through its retail locations in Houston and San Antonio, Texas, where a large number of evacuees from Louisiana and southeast Texas were staying. AT&T said it planned to make the phones available as early as Monday evening.
Chris Penrose, vice president and general manager for AT&T's wireless unit in south Texas, said this initiative will help people connect with family and friends or take care of critical needs in times of crisis.
This is what I consider to be 'a nice gesture', but with more than one eye on the PR value than actually being a good corporate citizen and now surely having got that out of the way, AT&T will tell Rajani what they have been doing to maintain service to customers!

Apparently not, as Rajani moves onto the practical efforts being made by T-Mobile inc (part of T-Mobile International AG, the mobile communications subsidiary of Deutsche Telekom AG) to deal with the emergency:
T-Mobile deployed an incident command team to Birmingham Command Center and locations throughout the Southeast and in Texas, to mobilize its team of engineers and technicians in case the hurricane affected networks. The company said it fortified its network switch operations that serve the Gulf Coast. Additionally, it planned to beef up its microwave radio equipment and send out Cell-on-Wheels (COWs) teams to facilitate wireless communications affected areas.
Good practical engineering and command control planning and implementation. No instant PR value, but what I would expect a reputable Telecommunication Provider to do in a Disaster Situation. Well done T-Mobile.

This good corporate citizen stuff is followed by some practical (and what I consider commonsense) advice to evacuees which I hope was made available via PBS, Public Service Advertising and handed out on the Evacuation Buses:
Service providers also requested people to adopt wise communication strategies to help them serve better during such crises. For example, instead of making voice calls to their friends or relatives, providers suggested using text messages, which use fewer network resources. Providers also asked customers to use landline phones as a backup since they do not require electricity to operate.

Finally Rajani covers what the Web (providing access is available) can do to help:
With advanced Web communication technologies such as Google Maps, weather, news, and alerts available on mobile phones, customers can utilize these resources to determine the status of weather conditions and handle emergency situations wisely. Examples of such services include AT&T’sMobiTV, AT&T Mobile TV and My-Cast Weather. Wireless data devices such as Apple’s iPhone and BlackBerry smartphones allow sending of messages to large groups of people simultaneously. However, these services are available under special subscriber plans and limited to a few subscribers.
All good practical stuff.

For More Articles by: Rajani Baburajan<

For Related Articles in this Blog See:

Friday, August 01, 2008

Mobile Phones On Aircraft - US Congress to vote on in-flight mobile ban

As those of you who follow the rambling path this blog takes, I have a problem with using Mobile Phones in-flight.

I first looked at this subject back in October 2007 with a piece entitled:
Mobile Phones on Aircraft - Like the Technology - Hate the Consequences

This was followed by an update Mobile Phones On Aircraft - Update In November 2007.
This was an Article 'lifted; from the excellent ABTN
Site.

Now another excellent site The Register
has published today news that US Lawmakers are going to vote on the pithily entitled HANG UP (Halting Airplane Noise to Give Us Peace) Act, which has passed the committee stage.

Now this act is NOT based on safety concerns (the current FAA rules are based on safety fears for which there is NO real justification), but on these calls being an Annoying Nuisance (Which they certainly will be).

Whilst I am always suspicious about the motives of some US Legislators (see Sniping at Airbus – A game all the US Establishment can play, from June 2005 which has a slight connection with this subject and UK-US Extradition Treaty and Certain American Politicians Support for Terrorists; from August 2006, which doesn't), on this occasion I am on the side of those who drafted this act and hope it makes it into to US Law.
.
This will of course upset those who ae addicted to Mobile Calls and Texting, but this law will at least mean the experience of flying to, from and across the USA will not become any worse and for that every frequent business traveller will be immensely grateful.

Newer Post on this subject:

Mobile Phones on Aircraft: Ryanair Rollout Voice/SMS/Email Services
24th February 2009

Tuesday, May 27, 2008

Mobile Phone - How many Features if any, do you need?

The release of the Hop1800 'voice only, no screen' Mobile from Hop-On has made me think, what features of my Mobile do I use and I came up with a short list?

  • Address Book for Voice/Text/Email and as a quick look-up for Landline, Fax Numbers and Email Addresses.
  • Voice Calls
  • Hands Free
  • Text Messages (Many more in, mainly from Services such as Voicemail)
  • Email (Mainly out - Passing Notes about me being delayed enroute)
  • Camera (once in a blue moon).
  • Internet (once in a blue moon).
One feature I sometimes think I might use one day is a data service connection for my Laptop, but the requirement has never arisen. So in theory I am using a reasonable number of features, but what if they weren't there?

  • No Address Book - Back to good old Filofax :-)
  • No Hands Free - Even Safer Driving as I wouldn't have the Phone Switched on.
  • No Text Messaging - Have to check Voicemail after meetings, etc, otherwise inconvenient, but I think l I could learn to live without it very quickly.
  • No Email - Not really a problem, if it wasn't there!
  • Camera - If didn't have it, it wouldn't be missed.
  • Internet - If didn't have it, it wouldn't be missed.
Now I accept that some of the above might be more of a problem if I didn't have a laptop, but for me the core requirements are:

  1. Voice Calls.
  2. Voicemail.
So what would happen if I stopped having a mobile?
As I have always treated Mobile Phones as a communication tool, not a necessary part of my lifestyle, I suspect that for a week I would be extremely irritated it was no longer available, but I also suspect those people used to calling me on the Mobile would be annoyed. In the longer term I would probably find that people would consider it very odd I didn't have one (in the 1990's I spent five years without a Television, something that was always treated with utter amazement and disbelieve).

To end, a couple of idle thoughts:
So how would others cope without a Mobile?
What would be the consequences of every mobile network going off-air for 24 hours?

Finally who is going to buy a very basic mobile like the HOP 1800 in Western Europe and North America?
OK other than Criminals, Terrorists and those who just want an emergency phone.
Actually the above probably means there is sufficient market for this type of device!